Forget the 19th century, it is professed that a game similar to cricket   might have been played in the sub- continent of Indo-Pakistan during the time of SIDHARTHA GAUTAM-THE BUDDHA (557-487 BC). It is claimed that the game of cricket used to be played in England during the reign of King RICHARD THE LION-HEARTED. But it is said that King EDWARD IV, the victor of WAR OF ROSES banned it. Reason - he found it childish ! Bet the Tendulkar's of today won't like that one. QUEEN ANNE of England, however begged to differ, She believed it to be a MANLY GAME and restored it.

Here's something fro literature. RUDYARD KIPPLING is alleged to call the cricketers in their all white kit as the "FLANNELL- ED FOOLS" Anyway the Western writers while unearthing its origin depended upon  words and their approach was more a linguistic one. And some of them have taken into account certain paintings. Similarly some of the writers of the Indo-Pak, claim on evidences of some nature that cricket was played in this  sub-continent during the time of GAUTAM-THE BUDDHA.

A conflict in opinion over this matter does exist but the two modules of masterwork lying in the GANDHARA GALLERIES OF LAHORE MUSEUM in which the objects shown in the stone sculpture resemble, would you believe it - very much to a CRICKET BAT and THE BALL ! Coupled to it the way a person has gripped it also leads the imagination to opine that it might have been played in this sub-continent during the time of BUDDHA THE GREAT.

Without intending to be clicheed, we would like to say, East is East. But, the sports historians from Europe have also tried to trace its origin and they have considered certain paintings, which according to their belief are not very clear and what actually is exhibited on the canvas is not the game of cricket for sure. They have simply deduced that it may have been the same game.

C.WHITAKER WILSON of Midland England, a famous cricket writer, broadcaster and actor opine: "In Anglo-Saxon there existed a word CRICC which meant a staff. I am inclined to think this is at least part of the origin of the word because the game was at one time played with a club or a staff". He Further states: "In the days of King RICHARD THE LION-HEARTED the game or at least a similar game was called HANDYN or HANDOUTE which seems to mean hand in or  hand out. THE ACTUAL WORD CRICKET DIDN'T APPEAR UNTIL ABOUT 1550".

Some more on that one. The opinions and findings of some other European writers are also quite interesting: A very famous writer says: "The first definite reference to Cricket dates back to 1478 when a game called CRIQUET was played at St. Omer in North-East FRANCE. It was not until 1598 that the reference to the sport was made in England. It came out in a Court Case involving a piece of land at Guildford Inn. The first Cricket Match on record took place in 1646 when two teams did battle for honours at Cox heath in Kent".

Describing the origin of the present day touring system of cricket teams the writer adds, "English Teams have been touring abroad since 1859 and that year the first expedition took an All-England Team under the captaincy of GEORGE PARR to CANADA AND THE U.S.A. That was the start of International Cricket forming the basis of present day tours". "In 1844 CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES played each other in an international Match making the oldest fixture between two National sides in Cricket taking place 33 years before TEST CRICKET began".

Adding more spice to the story is the suspicion that the game might have been played in the Scandinavian Countries much before it actually started in England or elsewhere. But again the derivation depends on the words, which are being used in those countries. The word "VIK" is however the source of this concept.

"In 1721,"says yet another writer "the Mariners of the East India Company's ships first time played cricket at BOMBAY in India". But if the gray stone sculpture of the GAUTAM BUDDHA is kept in view, then Cricket was being played on the soil of Pakistan even before Christ since TAXILA was the seat of learning and other socio-cultural activities during the time of BUDDHA THEGREAT.

The main characters have had time only for their personal ego clashes, to pursue their own selfish objectives, to see things only from their viewpoint and not from the larger viewpoint of the game's future. The governing bodies of the game in various countries are also to blame for not taking adequate steps to control the problem from having a snowballing effect.

An initial misjudgment in assessing the magnitude of the crisis and then have not done much in taking steps to halt the avalanche of charges and counter charges which have done so much to worsen the situation.