lacrows.com




 
Holier Than Thou
Unleashing the frontiers of the Match Fixing Saga
By S. Zeyaur Rehman

Due to the recent turn of events, the focus of cricket has shifted from the field to murkier stages. Infact, the match-fixing saga is defying the frontiers of all imaginations and transcending the horizons of fantasy by its sheer depth and variety. We find ourselves placed in the middle of nowhere, without any proper clue to the beginning and end of the unending episode. All our perceptions and responses to this massive scandal has been determined by the particular point of time which we chose to react and the place to which we belong. 

Can anyone authentically provide the exact instance, when the betting syndicate formally chose to prey upon cricket? Since then, it has claimed many a victims, known and unknown, famous and anonymous, punished and illusive. Spreading across continents and races over a period of time. The lurid details surfaced only when someone stumbled on to some piece of evidence somewhere. 

The reaction that these evidences have called in different places is an eye opener. It brings to the fore the psychology of a nation and people in times of challenges and adversity. One has witnessed an entire range of responses varying from contemptuous dismissal to stern action for the one and the same crime.

The first major crisis surfaced in Pakistan, when Mark Waugh and Shane Warne accused Salim Malik. The PCB is a classic example of how things malfunction. Neither did it refute the allegations nor did it defend its players. Rashid Latif, Basit Ali and to some extent Aamir Sohail cried themselves hoarse about their knowledge of the sleazy deals, but they were silenced. Akram was dragged in and out time and again, Malik was banned for life and finally the board came up with a sloppy work in the name of the findings of the Justice Qayyum Commission. 

The BCCI fared no better. After years of dilly-dallying and a number of controversies and contradictions, we finally arrived at some conclusion. That too has become a problem in itself rather than the solution it was intended to be.

Now as the reports about Aravinda de Silva are surfacing, the Sri Lankan Board is waking up to the fact that its players, including its longest serving Captain has been involved. So far there has been no sincere effort on its part to reach to the core of the issue. 

That sums up the Asian scene. In the process we forgot about the 'real culprits'. The Aussies have cleverly managed to shift the blame to the 'sub-continent' as the place where 'such things' happen. The Aussies are boasting as the ones who first reported the matter and in the process everyone forgets that they were the ones to have accepted nay kind of money (of course for pitch and weather information).

 



























 


It is the Aussies who have introduced big money in cricket. It was a gentleman called Kerry Packer, who robbed cricket of its innocence by introducing it to the lure of the mammon. The Rebel World Series was a greater challenge to the official set up of cricket than any of these ball tampering and match fixing controversies can be. As far as betting goes, their own player had put money on his team losing the match, in the very same match in which he himself was playing. 

It has once again become a White vs. Black issue (except for the West Indies which always has an ambiguous stand) and the white solidarity is all out to brand the Asians as the culprits. The New Zealand and English cricket boards are tight lipped about the involvement of their players and the ACB has clearly refused subjecting its players to scrutiny by Asian judges.

Let us come to South Africa, racially the most sensitive of the lot. Though it has banned Cronje, still Cronje has the impertinence to talk of 'negotiations' with the board regarding the termination of his life ban. And why should he not behave in the manner in which he is behaving? There are CD's being released in a gesture of sympathy and support for the 'fallen hero' who despite all the impeccable credentials was tempted by the Satan while on a tour to the unholy land. The players miss him on reaching a landmark. The other accused continue to be a part of the team, which amongst others has a convicted rapist in its ranks.

The message is clear, as clear as it ever was. The chosen people can do no wrong and it is only the lesser mortals that can further debase themselves. We are not asking anyone to rally behind Azhar or Malik, but why are the other culprits roaming with their heads high? Why are the 'original sinners' pointing a finger at us? Why have they been allowed to maintain a holier than thou image and get away with it? Why are our players branded as devils and why is not a single why being asked when it comes to them?

 

TOP


| Homepage | On Line Polls | Polling Results | Post Your | Messages FromRankings | Statistics | Teams | Autographs  |  
| Cric-Calendar | New Interviews | Picture Gallery | World Records | History | Comparative Charts | Refine Your Cricket |
| Cricketology | Dream Team | Time to Laugh | Did U Know | Legends | Quotations | Savi's Diary | Fan-doo Letters |
| Match fixing Saga | Articles Archive  | Cric-couples | Inspiration from Hollywood | Dupliket | Chat |
| World Cup Archive | Chilli 'N' Pepper | Columns | Controversies
| Contest | Tournament Info | News | Membership |

lacrows.com -- cricket,news,interviews,statistics Links